What a Royalty Check looks like.
This example uses invented names, numbers and clauses. It is designed to show the shape of the work, not imply a real publisher discrepancy.
Two items require clarification.
The marketing recoupment shown this period appears inconsistent with the lifetime cap stated in the sample agreement.
Reconciliation
| Item | Agreement | Statement | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Developer share | 60% of Net Receipts | 60% | ✓ Match |
| Opening recoup balance | Prior closing balance | €0 | ✓ Match |
| Marketing recoupment | €50,000 lifetime cap | €56,392 cumulative | ! Clarify |
| Currency conversion | Not specified | Rate not shown | ! Ask |
Finding 01 · Marketing recoupment
The sample statement includes €11,500 of marketing expenditure in Q3. Based on the three sample statements supplied, cumulative marketing recoupment rises to €56,392. Clause 8.4 of the fictional agreement states a €50,000 lifetime cap unless otherwise agreed in writing.
Question to ask: Can you show how the Q3 marketing deduction is permitted under clause 8.4, given the cumulative amount already recouped in prior statements?
Finding 02 · Currency conversion
The statement converts USD receipts into EUR but does not identify the conversion date, source or rate. The fictional agreement does not specify a method.
Question to ask: Which exchange-rate source and date were used for the USD-to-EUR conversion in this period?